---
title: "✦ Citation Stubs"
subtitle: "Entrogenics Research Citations"
author: "Tohn Burray Travolta (Entrogenic Research Collective)"
collaboration: "Co-synthesized with large-language systems (GPT-5, Claude, Gemini) under the Cyclic-6 and Kybernōsis protocols"
series: "Entrogenic Papers | Adaptive Systems Kollektive"
version: "v1.0 — October 2025"
license: "CC BY-SA 4.0"
repository: "github.com/entrogenics/entrogenics-core"
doi: ""
manifest-type: "entrogenic-standard-paper"
---

Authorship Declaration

This document was produced through synthetic co-authorship within the Entrogenic research framework.

The human author — Tohn Burray Travolta — provided conceptual design, curation, and final synthesis.

Language-model agents assisted in drafting, structural refinement, and citation weaving following the Cyclic-6 process: Unfold → Disturb → Collapse → Bind → Dissipate → Recur.

All content has been reviewed, edited, and ethically approved by the human author, who assumes full accountability for its meaning and publication.

Entrogenics regards writing as co-adaptation between consciousness and code; each paper is a living artifact within that evolving grammar.

Abstract / Invocation

This web edition arises from the Entrogenic tradition — a trans-disciplinary inquiry into adaptive systems, cyclic intelligence, and the synthesis of human intuition with artificial reasoning.

It preserves the original manuscript while adopting a digital ritual format consistent with Entrogenic publication standards.

Symbolic Standard — The Catalytic Star (✡)

The six-pointed star (✡, Unicode U+2721) represents the Bind / Catalytic Unification phase within The Fool’s Cycle, signifying harmonic convergence of dualities in adaptive transformation.

Never substitute ✡ with alternative glyphs. The canonical sequence appears below:

0 → ✡ → ☉ → 0′

Confirm UTF-8 encoding in all Entrogenic manuscripts.
Preserve <meta charset="UTF-8"> declarations in HTML builds.
Validate symbol rendering across browsers before distribution.

Citation Stubs

This file lists all external citation stubs used in the CORE Thesis. These are placeholders for full citations to be added later.

Chapter 1

[Stub 01] Tooze, A. (2022). Chartbook #135: What Is the Polycrisis?
[Stub 02] Lawrence, M. et al. (2023). The Polycrisis: Tracking the Interacting Crises of the 21st Century. Cascade Institute.
[Stub 03] World Economic Forum. Global Risks Report 2024.
[Stub 04] Homer-Dixon, T. (2020). Commanding Hope.
[Stub 05] Holling, C. S. (2001). “Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems.” Ecosystems, 4(4), 390–405.
[Stub 06] Royce, W. (1970). “Managing the Development of Large Software Systems.” IEEE WESCON Proceedings.
[Stub 07] Boehm, B. (1988). “A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement.” Computer, 21(5).
[Stub 08] Sommerville, I. (2015). Software Engineering (10th ed.).
[Stub 09] Denning, S. (2018). The Age of Agile.
[Stub 10] Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. (2012). “A Decade of Agile Methodologies.” Information and Software Technology, 53(5).
[Stub 11] Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Takeuchi, H. (2016). “Embracing Agile.” Harvard Business Review, 94(5).
[Stub 12] Conforto, E., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C. (2016). “Project Management Agility: A Systematic Literature Review.” Int. Journal of Project Management.

Chapter 2

[Stub 13] Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems.
[Stub 14] Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline.
[Stub 15] Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial.
[Stub 16] Ostrom, E. (2009). “A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability.” Science, 325(5939).
[Stub 17] Floridi, L. (2019). The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design.
[Stub 18] Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind.

Chapter 3

[Stub 19] Alexander, S. (2014). Meditations on Moloch.
[Stub 20] Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation.
[Stub 21] Schelling, T. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior.
[Stub 22] Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence.
[Stub 23] Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI.
[Stub 24] Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible.
[Stub 25] Floridi, L. (2020). “The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.” Philosophy & Technology, 33(1).

Chapter 4

[Stub 26] Macy, J. & Johnstone, C. (2012). Active Hope.
[Stub 27] Berry, T. (1999). The Great Work.
[Stub 28] Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle.
[Stub 29] Capra, F. & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The Systems View of Life.
[Stub 30] Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding Sweetgrass.
[Stub 31] Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth.
[Stub 32] Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics.
[Stub 33] Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom.

Chapter 5

[Stub 34] Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind.
[Stub 35] Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the Firm.
[Stub 36] Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics.
[Stub 37] Hoffman, D. (2019). The Case Against Reality.
[Stub 38] Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind.
[Stub 39] Churchman, C. W. (1967). The Systems Approach.

Chapter 6

[Stub 40] Holling, C. S. (2001). Ecosystems, 4(4), 390–405.
[Stub 41] Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems.
[Stub 42] Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems.
[Stub 43] Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At Home in the Universe.
[Stub 44] Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos.
[Stub 45] Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company.
[Stub 46] Spencer-Brown, G. (1969). Laws of Form.
[Stub 47] Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective.

Conclusion

[Stub 48] Malone, T. W. (2018). Superminds: The Surprising Power of People and Computers Thinking Together.
[Stub 49] Heylighen, F. (2015). "The Global Brain." Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114, 23–31.

Foreword

[Stub 50] Shneiderman, B. (2020). "Human-Centered AI." ACM Interactions.
[Stub 51] Dellermann, D. et al. (2019). "Hybrid Intelligence: The Next Generation of Human-AI Collaboration." Business Horizons, 62(4), 475–488.